A Web site for students and friends of journalism
© 2010 William A. Mulligan, Ph.D. All rights reserved.
Professor of Journalism, former department chairman
California State University, Long Beach
DOW JONES NEWS RELEASE
Newspaper Fund to provide grants
PRINCETON, N.J. (Feb. 5, 2010) — The board of directors of the Dow Jones Newspaper Fundapproved $459,000 in grants and operating expenses for 2010 programs for high school and college students and high school journalism teachers.
The budget includes $42,000 for two multimedia training programs for professors. The first will be held at the University of Texas, El Paso, directed by Zita Arocha and targeted at schools with large populations of Hispanic students.
The second will be held at Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, directed by Pam Johnson and aimed at professors from the nation's Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
"Last year's multimedia program at Western was an overwhelming success," Rich Holden, executive director of the Fund, said. "We had more than twice as many applicants as available spots. This year we will be able to serve a much wider audience. The Fund thinks it's essential that the professors are given the latest skills to pass along to their students."
The Fund will again operate six Centers for Editing Excellence and a business reporting training center. It will also provide more than 75 internships to college juniors, seniors and graduate students in its news, multimedia, sports editing and business reporting programs.
In addition, Adviser Update, the Fund's quarterly newspaper, will continue to be distributed free to high school journalism teachers. It is experiencing growing circulation and support from sponsors.
Richard J. Levine, president of the board, said, "The directors of the fund are heartened by the strong response to its programs, designed to promote careers in journalism, amid the continuing financial difficulties in the news business,"
GRANTS APPROVED — College programs, $210,000: The News Editing Intern Program will train college students to work as news, sports and multimedia editors during the summer of 2010.
Each will attend a Center for Editing Excellence prior to the internship. The Fund allocated money to cover scholarships for those interns returning to school, intern travel and operating costs.
The news editing training centers are at Temple University, Philadelphia, directed by Edward Trayes; University of Texas at Austin, directed by S. Griffin Singer; University of Missouri, Columbia, directed by Brian Brooks, and Pennsylvania State University, directed by Marie Hardin.
Centers at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, directed by Charlyne Berens, and Western Kentucky University, directed by Johnson, will train sports and multimedia interns, respectively.
Michelle LaRoche, training editor at Dow Jones Newswires, will instruct 12 college students in the Business Reporting Program to cover business at daily newspapers, news services and Web
sites.
TEACHER PROGRAMS — $10,000: National High School Journalism Teacher of the Year, $3,000, was allotted for scholarships to be awarded in 2010 to students of five high school journalism teachers chosen as the best in 2009.
TOPICS: media criticism, television news
SUMMARY: The death of market researcher Frank Magid is an opportunity to examine the profound effect he had on the evolution of local television news.
Magid, 78, was known as one of television's original "news doctors" because of his advice to turn the local newscast into entertainment.
Among his recommendations what is now somewhat derided as "happy talk." He urged the replacement of the lone while male anchor with a team of young, good-looking anchors who bantered with each other.
The newscast, often called "action news" was flashy and fast-paced. Old-fashioned journalists derided these techniques and doubted that they improved journalism.
COMMENTARY: The era of "happy talk" on television may have been a commercial success but many journalists have criticized it for demeaning their field.
The death of Frank Magid, one of the original "news doctors" who came up with the concept, is an opportunity to discuss the evolution of television news and to figure out what that has meant for journalism.
TOPICS: new media, Olympics
SUMMARY: Like all the previous Olympics, NBC plans to televise some of the major events on a tape-delayed basis.
But this time the television network will be competing with a media world that provides instant updates — via Twitter, email alerts or multiple Web site updates — to a world that is now used to finding out results when they happen.
NBC is fortunate in that it will have fewer delayed events than usual because Vancouver is in North America and on the Pacific time zone.
Still, it is difficult to see how NBC will be able to maximize its audience if many members of that audience already know the results before they are televised.
COMMENTARY: The Olympics is one area where new media can have a profound impact since many of those interested in the games can find out the results instantaneously. That could prove problematic for NBC which is counting on a huge audience to justify the amount of money it paid for the Olympic rights.
The question is how NBC will adjust to this new world, particularly in future Olympic games when there is not a favorable time zone situation.
RELATED ARTICLE:
"Vancouver Feels Heat — Outside and In"
by Geoffrey A. Fowler
Feb. 16, 2010
Online Exclusive
TOPICS: classified advertising, online journalism
SUMMARY: This piece compares and contrasts the workings of Craigslist, the online classified advertising site with that of The New York Times Web site.
A recent article in Wired said that despite its popularity, Craigslist is a mess. It is poorly run and has refused to monetize itself. In contrast, the New York Times has invested heavily in its Web site and it is highly monetized.
The Times even plans to adopt a metered model. Yet the point of this piece is that Craigslist remains incredibly popular, attracting several times the number of users at any news site.
The reason: Craig Newmark created a site that has the users' desires and needs in mind. If newspapers what to succeed online, they should adopt the principles Craigslist uses to attract viewers.
COMMENTARY: This provocative piece compares and contrasts the successes — and failures — of classified advertising site Craigslist with the New York Times site.
The author, a former arts editor for Salon.com, makes the case that newspapers should quit complaining about how Craigslist stole their classified ads and instead adopt the model it uses to attract more readers.
RELATED ARTICLE:
"New York Times to Charge for Web"
by Russell Adams
Jan. 21, 2010
Online Exclusive
TOPICS: celebrity news, media acquisitions
SUMMARY: Gawker has made a name for itself in the online journalism world as the go to site for celebrity rumors and gossip as well as tech news.
Now it has made its first acquisition by purchasing Cityfile, an online collection of famous New York media and business personalities. In purchasing Cityfile, Gawker has also ousted its current editor-in-chief, Gabriel Snyder, who had been on the job for 18 months.
Snyder is being replaced by Remy Stern, the founder of Cityfile who is also the former editor of Radar magazine as well as a former writer for some of Gawker's Web sites. It is unclear why Snyder was pushed out but the founder of Gawker, Nick Denton, said he is satisfied with the editorial direction of Gawker.
COMMENTARY: Gawker has become a prominent online news site for those interested in celebrity gossip as well as tech news. Now it is making news itself by announcing its first acquisition as well as the firing of its current editor-in-chief and hiring of a new one.
As standalone online news sites become more popular and prominent, it will be worth monitoring the changes that they are undergoing with the same vigilance that one use to apply to acquisitions and personnel changes at traditional media companies.
TOPICS: business reporting, plagiarism
SUMMARY: A business reporter for The New York Times has been accused of plagiarizing a number of passages from other publications, including The Wall Street Journal and Reuters.
Zachary Kouwe, whose primary journalism job at the Times is to write for the newspaper's DealBook blog, purportedly used similar language that had previously been reported in a Journal article about a lawsuit filed by the trustee in the Bernard Madoff case.
The incident was brought to light because of a letter from the Journal to the Times. A subsequent investigation indicated that there were other cases of possible plagiarism and the Times said it will take appropriate action.
COMMENTARY: Clearly, plagiarism is one of the greatest journalistic sins there is.
Most news organizations have a zero tolerance for such transgressions. It is particularly troublesome when a well-respected news organization engages in such behavior.
Teachers spend a great deal of time drilling into the heads of our students why plagiarism is bad. Here is a real world example that can show the consequences of such an act.
TOPICS: media cross-ownership, media regulation
SUMMARY: Following in the footsteps of the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission wants to launch an investigation into the current state of the news industry and industry trends in order to see if it should change its rules and regulations.
Among the FCC's regulations are those limiting the number of TV or radio stations one company can own in a market as well as barring one company from owning a major newspaper and television station in the same market.
According to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, the inquiry is designed to examine the fundamental changes that have enveloped the media industry and how those changes should translate into FCC policies.
He said the inquiry will steer clear of recommending any control of editorial content in any industry.
COMMENTARY: Last month the FTC held hearings on the future of journalism. Now the FCC is getting into the act, releasing an 11-page request for information about the state of the news business.
The results of the study may or may not end up with the FCC changing some of its rules or regulations.
Regardless, this inquiry should prove interesting and give an important window into what is currently happening in regards to media ownership as well as other industry trends.
RELATED ARTICLE:"FTC Not Sure How to Enforce Blogger Disclosure Rules"
by Marisa Taylor
Jan. 15, 2010
Online Exclusive
TOPICS: media bankruptcy, newspaper industry
SUMMARY: Media
conglomerate MediaNews Holding has become the seventh primarily
newspaper company to declare bankruptcy over the past year.
MediaNews owns 54 newspapers along with television and radio stations. Among its newspapers are the Denver Post and the San Jose Mercury News, as well as the Press-Telegram in Long Beach, Calif., and the Daily News in Los Angeles.
The company is run by William Dean Singleton, who says the bankruptcy filing will allow MediaNews to clean up its debt.
Singleton
says he hopes to lead a newspaper-industry consolidation, which he says
will help publishers remain financially viable by creating stronger and
more efficient groups of newspapers.
Among the MediaNews newspapers that might welcome consolidation is the St. Paul Pioneer Press, which could be combined with the Minneapolis Star Tribune as well as several adjacent newspapers in Southern California.
COMMENTARY: The bankruptcy of MediaNews holding continues the bad news for the newspaper industry into 2010.
In terms of MediaNews, the structure of the bankruptcy should not have a negative effect on its 54 daily newspapers.
This
might also give MediaNews CEO William Dean Singleton an opportunity to
engage in the newspaper industry consolidation that he believes will
ultimately lead to the financial health of the newspaper industry.
Whether consolidation works remains to be seen.
TOPICS: online journalism, wire services
SUMMARY: Traditional news organizations have for some time been struggling with the issue of how the major Internet portals like Yahoo, Google and Microsoft have been using their content without paying for it.
Now the Associated Press, a cooperative of traditional news organizations, is closing in on a deal with Yahoo that would impose tighter restrictions and a higher price tag on those stories distributed on Yahoo's news site.
At the same time, Google has stopped adding AP stories to its Google News site. For much of the past, traditional news organizations have not minded that the Internet portals used their content because it drove traffic to their sites.
But now that advertising revenue has been declining, those same news organizations want to collect fees when their content is distributed online.
COMMENTARY: A huge debate has been about online journalism and whether traditional news organizations should allow their content to be used for free by the major Internet portals.
Now many news organizations are saying enough is enough and want to be paid for their content, particularly because their advertising revenues have been drying up.
Interestingly, the chart accompanying this article shows just how traffic is directed by the Internet portals to these news sites.
How this issue of paid content is resolved will have tremendous consequences for both traditional news organizations and Internet portals.
—Reviewed by Joe Kaplan,
Syracuse University

WASHINGTON (Nov. 19, 2009) -- RTDNA is
disappointed to learn that the Senate Judiciary Committee failed to bring a
federal shield law bill to a vote again on Thursday.
"The
continued attempts to give the government the ability to override the shield law
would make it a paper shield at best," said RTDNA Chairman Stacey Woelfel.
"While I'm disappointed the committee did not vote to pass the bill today, my
hope is that senators can regroup to bring a stronger version of the bill back
for consideration as soon as possible."
The Judiciary Committee
Chairman, Patrick Leahy, recessed the session Thursday after it appeared the
Republican senators were lining up a number of amendments that supporters felt
would weaken the bill.
Most opposition at the hearing centered around how the
bill defines "journalists' and how the federal government could override the
protections of the law in cases of "national security."
Leahy later warned that
the bill may be sent directly to the floor, bypassing the committee, if senators
are unable to reach a compromise.
Some Republicans on the committee
appear concerned that the current form of the bill – a seeming compromise – is
merely a consensus of supporters and does not include dissenting views. Several
Republicans have expressed displeasure about a perceived imbalance between the
protections for journalists and security issues. The compromise bill, however,
would require journalists to disclose information in instances involving matters
of national security.
A federal shield law would help journalists
protect confidential sources. Currently, most states already protect this right
of journalists. But federal lawmakers have been reluctant to grant the same
protection from federal subpoenas and other action.
* * *
Opinion
TOPICS: court reporting, First Amendment
SUMMARY: Floyd Abrams is one of the most prominent First Amendment attorneys in the country.
He has represented the New York Times in several high profile press freedom cases including the Pentagon Papers case.
But in this interview, Abrams takes strong exception to the Times position on the U.S. Supreme Court's most recent free speech case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
In that case, the Court ruled 5-4 that corporations have a First Amendment right to spend money to influence political elections.
The Times and several other media organizations have roundly criticized this decision, but Abrams says the ruling simply extends the same free speech protections that media corporations now have to all corporations.
COMMENTARY: The Citizens United case is the most significant First Amendment case to come down this year and it extends many of the First Amendment protections to corporations.
Despite that, many media companies fear that extending the First Amendment to corporations could actually harm democracy. The arguments on both sides are compelling and while Abrams defends the Court's decision here, he also shows that he could just as easily argue the other side.
—Reviewed by Joe Kaplan,
Syracuse University